<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.literaryagenda.com &#187; Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.literaryagenda.com/category/film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.literaryagenda.com</link>
	<description>Book reviews, literary news and opinions on film</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In Praise of Older Women</title>
		<link>http://www.literaryagenda.com/in-praise-of-older-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.literaryagenda.com/in-praise-of-older-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Praise of Older Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Vizinczey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literaryagenda.com/?p=31462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find myself, after being uncomplimentary of the summer reading lists, rediscovering an old bookstore of which very existence I forgot about, and feverishly searching for literary works that should be relatively light, though not superficial and safe as in the author should have been receiving acclamation from trustworthy sources for his piece of work. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.literaryagenda.com/in-praise-of-older-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Acting</title>
		<link>http://www.literaryagenda.com/acting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.literaryagenda.com/acting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literaryagenda.com/?p=31421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having the privilege of behaving fearless or fearsome, bad-ass or pedant (and the list can continue for long), without real-life consequences, is one of the great advantages of being an actor. It doesn&#8217;t matter if one creates a sociable or an introvert self, a successful or a scumbag citizen. For what is counts, is solely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.literaryagenda.com/acting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan</title>
		<link>http://www.literaryagenda.com/the-real-gaze-film-theory-after-lacan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.literaryagenda.com/the-real-gaze-film-theory-after-lacan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Theory After Lacan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Gaze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd McGowan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.literaryagenda.com/?p=29217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here the author develops a psychoanalytic theory of the movie, which took the movie as a starting point. Avoids telling about historical context of film production as well as it`s reception. When McGowan says about the audience he doesn&#8217;t mean the empirical spectator, but the one which is expected by movie text himself. Of course [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.literaryagenda.com/the-real-gaze-film-theory-after-lacan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

